Greg On Demand

Mon Feb 15

STUPID WWAY

Every Monday morning, I sit down and check my DVR to make sure everything is going to record properly over the next week. Today I encountered a HUGE problem. Our local ABC-affiliate WWAY has committed the ultimate sin: it is not showing LOST tomorrow at its regularly scheduled time. The episode is now airing at 1:06 AM Wednesday morning directly following Jimmy Kimmel. I am so pissed. Here is the full text of an email I sent to WWAY:

Dear WWAY,
Good morning! My name is Greg Johnson and I am writing to tell you that I am very upset with your decision to push Tuesday February 16th’s episode of LOST to a later time slot. You have chosen to replace LOST with a basketball game between UNC and Georgia Tech, both of whom have less-than-favorable records this year. This game does not represent an important milestone for anyone and I will most certainly not tune in and will encourage ALL of my friends (most of whom are between the ages of 18 and 49) not to tune in.


To be quite honest, you have hurt my feelings. LOST is a cultural phenomenon and is the highest-watched show on ABC in the key 18-49 demographic (to which I belong). It is now in its final season and there are only a dozen or so episodes left. Each episode represents a bittersweet moment for me as I come to terms with the fact that I will soon have to say goodbye to all of the characters that I have come to love over the years. I just want to thank you for ruining this moment for me and all of my friends, and for the thousands of LOST viewers in this area.


In my opinion, the only thing you can do to make it right would be to reverse your ridiculous decision to show the basketball game and instead show LOST at its regularly scheduled time. I hope you will take all of this into consideration.

Thu Feb 11

Adrian is right!?!??

justlikeclockwork:

rockandrollhistory:

WARNING: MILD LOST EPISODE 3 SPOILERS BELOW:

I didn’t like last night’s episode of Lost as much as the two last week. This is mainly due to the fact that it focused heavily on Kate (who I can’t stand) and Jack’s talking in circles with Dogen.

It was also strange to see Mac from It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia as I had completely forgotten that he had a blink and you missed it appearance three years ago. In this episode, he was given a name and a bitchy attitude. Though he didn’t have a huge amount of screentime, I can’t say that he made a very good case for having a dramatic acting career after Sunny ends. He should for sure stick to comedy.

That being said, I’m quite interested to see where the show goes in the next few episodes as things get set up for the end of the series. I’m also glad they got a Kate-centric episode out of the way early. Evangeline Lilly has only a few looks. She is either looking brooding, looking sad, looking sad and brooding, or looking deeply into Jack or Sawyer’s eyes. She’s like the Mischa Barton of Lost.

I am also quite excited about the zombie/contagious disease storyline that is getting developed. That is all.

I have to say that while Adrian and I have not always seen eye to eye when it comes to analyzing LOST, I essentially agree with everything he wrote.

Rob McElhenney was simply not good in a dramatic role.  It really just felt like Mac made a cross-narrative appearance on LOST, because McElhenney acted exactly like his SUNNY character.

Adrian doesn’t think Evangeline Lilly is that great.  Fair enough.  Personally, I find her very attractive.  I don’t think she is a great actress, but she fits the bill just fine.  Regardless, I agree with AK in that Kate-centric episodes, for me, are drab and weak.  I don’t know what it is…maybe I’m just not all that interested in the idiosyncrasies and depth (or lack thereof) of her character.  I love it when she just meshes, and fits into the story and the plot of the show; not when it’s centered around her.

Don’t get it twisted folks…I am very excited about LOST and the direction it is heading.  I have years of my youth invested into this show (a lot of beers, blunts, blogs, and shared experiences).  I can’t wait to see what happens next…

You are both right. It was a pretty lame episode overall. The pacing was slow (not necessarily a bad thing but this episode really verged on boring) and Kate is, of course, not the most interesting character. I think we should focus on the positive, however, as we do not have very many episodes left.

Yes, Jack and Dogen talking in circles went on too long, but I think a lot was gained. Remember when Jack saw Dogen’s baseball and asked him what it was? Dogen replied quite simply that it was “a baseball,” thereby warning the audience to not read too much into things. In other words, sometimes on LOST, a baseball is just a baseball (Richard also taught John this lesson when he gave him the compass in the Season 5 premiere. John: “What does it do?” Richard: “It points North, John.”). It was a very valuable and well-timed lesson which we should all consider as we move forward into the rest of the season.

I also feel like Dogen gave us a little more insight into the castaways’ true purpose on the island. He was adamant about Sawyer not leaving the temple and quick to send a search party after him, meaning that he, at least (but probably also Jacob and the Island itself), needs each and every one of them for something specific. It just gave more depth to an already deep-rooted question: Why are they here (and based on the promos for next weeks episode “The Substitute,” Sawyer, at least, may soon have that answer)?

I am also very intrigued by the new “sideways” storytelling. I very sincerely hope that it pays off in a spectacular way, and I have faith that it will. Here is a brief theory I posted on a friend’s facebook note after last week’s episode:

“I think we will see things in the new reality progress just as they did on the island, albeit on a much smaller and more realistic scale. Remember, as Mrs. Hawking told us: “The universe has a way of course-correcting itself.” So everything that was supposed to happen to these people on the island must still happen to them off of it. The characters who died will still die, and the characters who found redemption will still find it. Jin and Sun, for example, will be able to fix their marriage the same way they did on the island. Jack will fix Locke so he can walk again. Claire will not give Aaron up for adoption, and so on.
I think the point is that we all have destinies which must be fulfilled, whether we are on the island or not.”

I feel that What Kate Does only strengthened this theory (and I must acknowledge of course that I am certainly not the only one who has put this theory forth). Claire and Kate always shared a sort-of sisterly bond on the island, and Kate even acted as midwife when Aaron was born on the island. It seems, so far, that things are progressing off the island the same way they did on it (even down to Ethan’s involvement, although of course we all saw the differences there).I wonder if Claire giving Kate her credit card will cause any problems down the line.

My major problem with the episode was Kate’s stupidity. Sawyer said, to Kate specifically, to NOT COME LOOKING FOR HIM. Given Sawyer’s new violent dark streak, I think it would have been wise to stay in the safe-haven of the temple. But stupid Kate went after him. Also, it was a stupid idea for Kate to keep driving around in that same taxi. I’m sure there were a lot of cops out looking for her that day, and she could easily have switched to a more discreet vehicle at any time, and she could have at least parked it instead of just leaving it outside the hospital for everyone to see.

Next week’s episode, The Substitute, is Locke-centric, and Locke episodes are always quite good.

Mon Nov 9

rockandrollhistory:

I spent a good chunk of today sitting at Barnes & Nobles reading Chuck Klosterman’s new book Eating the Dinosaur (because, on principle, I don’t accept having to pay $25 for a book. It’s like paying $20 for a sandwich. Sure the sandwich may be delicious, but is it really worth that much money?). Unsurprisingly, the book is excellent and Klosterman is as insightful as always when dissecting modern pop cultural stuff like Garth Brooks/Chris Gaines and how they relate to being fake or authentic in the music industry.

However, while I was reading, I was also privy to one of the most boring, pointless conversations I have ever heard. The family behind me spent over half an hour discussing where they were going to eat after going shopping on Black Friday. They devoted an entire thirty minutes to arguing the pros and cons of Cracker Barrel vs. IHOP after a long day of shopping. While I have devoted half an hour to many pointless things (I still watch the Real World), I don’t think I have ever spent so long on something that will almost certainly not matter/change when you get to that point (which is still nearly three weeks away). And, why did this discussion have to occur when you’re sitting at Barnes & Nobles. This makes no sense. However, the obvious answer is Cracker Barrel.

This is also hilarious considering the close proximity of those two restaurants here in Wilmington. But you really wasted an opportunity here, Adrian. You could have simply turned around and said:

“Excuse me, I couldn’t help but overhear your conversation; have you considered Saltworks II on Wrightsville? Its better than both of those places because they now have a TV inside!”

It might have worked.

Thu Oct 15
moviesinframes:

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, 2009 (dir. Michael Bay)
By Rhett

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is the biggest piece of shit I have ever seen, and thats saying a lot because I usually like everything.

moviesinframes:

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, 2009 (dir. Michael Bay)

By Rhett

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is the biggest piece of shit I have ever seen, and thats saying a lot because I usually like everything.

Wed Sep 23
rockandrollhistory:

moviesinframes:

Stranger Than Fiction, 2006 (dir. Marc Forster)


A very underrated film. Will Ferrell is very subdued, but still very funny in this one. I highly recommend it. The cast is excellent (Maggie Gyllenhaal, Dustin Hoffman, Emma Thompson, and Will Ferrell) and the script is both smart and funny.

Dude, you forgot about Queen Latifah. She is in this film as well.

rockandrollhistory:

moviesinframes:

Stranger Than Fiction, 2006 (dir. Marc Forster)

A very underrated film. Will Ferrell is very subdued, but still very funny in this one. I highly recommend it. The cast is excellent (Maggie Gyllenhaal, Dustin Hoffman, Emma Thompson, and Will Ferrell) and the script is both smart and funny.

Dude, you forgot about Queen Latifah. She is in this film as well.

Mon Sep 7
moviesinframes:

Back to the Future Part II, 1989 (dir. Robert Zemeckis)
By Casey

I’ve tried very hard to fight it away over the past few years, but I was just lying to myself: Back to the Future II will always be my favorite movie.

moviesinframes:

Back to the Future Part II, 1989 (dir. Robert Zemeckis)

By Casey

I’ve tried very hard to fight it away over the past few years, but I was just lying to myself: Back to the Future II will always be my favorite movie.

Thu May 28

No Subject

I just want to let everyone know that my roommate Will and I are working on a LOST parody that we are calling “Jack and Kate + 8.” You guys know me, that shit is going to be hilarious.

Fri May 15

Wolverine

Yep, I saw Wolverine last night. I’ve already seen Star Trek twice and we really wanted to see something, so it ended up being Wolverine. There is no point in really reviewing it at length here, but if someone were to ask me how it was, I would say “it’s alright, not my favorite.” There are a lot of awesome parts and you’ll have fun laughing at the parts that aren’t quite so awesome. It’s better than X3, not as good as X2, nowhere near as good as Star Trek. Yes, the effects are terrible and thats something I could not figure out. How does a movie this big look so shitty? Wolverine’s claws looked like a set of gag claws he picked up from Toontown, Patrick Stewart just looked silly in his cameo, etc. I cannot recommend the film, but if you were already planning on seeing it, I wouldn’t tell you not to.

Thu May 14

Still Lost

Before I read through everything that was posted since I last posted something, let me just say that I’m sorry for all of the trouble I have caused.

Lost is a TV show that truly means something to a lot of us, and I felt it deserved a defense; I also felt that if anyone was equipped to defend it, it was me.

Watching Lost has become my favorite activity. When I’m home, we sit down together and watch it as a family. When I’m here in Wilmington, its something I only do with my closest friends. We watch and re-watch episodes, discussing even the most minute details for hours on end. I recognize that it is only a TV show, but it really does mean a lot to me, and I know that I’m not alone. In fact, I would go so far as to say that to belittle the show is to belittle me and the strong relationships I have built that were all initially based on shared affection for Lost. I shouldn’t have taken it personally, but I did, and I apologize.

But I will never agree with you about Kate, or back down on this point: She is SO FUCKING HOT.

Found

rockandrollhistory:

Because I work at an ABC station, I saw a lot of Lost without the sound on tonight. I simply cannot bring myself to care about the show. It has the blandest leads ever. The actress who plays Kate is only mildly attractive and mildly interesting. I can’t believe anyone would do anything crazy or fight over her. And, to quote Seth Rogen, you know what’s interesting about Matthew Fox? Nothing.

A slightly smaller problem with Lost is something that I like to call the “Third Season Suck.” By the third season of any TV show, no matter how good it is, it starts to fade (the Wire is the exception that proves the rule as its 4th season was its best. However, the 5th season wasn’t as good as the ones before). The middle of the first to the end of the second seasons tend to be great and it’s all downhill after that as, because all shows go on until they get cancelled, they have to get more and more preposterous or tread over well worn ground to buy time and keep the show going until sweeps and the season finale. I feel that all shows should be limited to two, sometimes three, seasons before they are cancelled or forced to recast the entire thing to keep things fresh.

Humorously, Lost suffers from the same problem as One Tree Hill (though OTH was never good and Lost was once okay): it has gone on for way too long and things just get more and more ridiculous. For example, here is how the survivors go back to the island in 1977: they get on a one way flight to Guam, smuggle Locke’s corpse on board, survive a lightning strike while in flight, and wake up on the island with no specific memory of how they got there. Where’s a Delorean when you need one?

Now, I’m not one of those people who hates on stuff I haven’t experienced. Okay, maybe I am. I hate on Zac Effron, Miley Cyrus, and Twilight without having experienced any of it, but I have seen quite a bit of Lost. I watched a little of the 1st season when it started but stopped when I realized that all the important stuff only happens in the first and last five minutes of each episode (which is something that can be extended to the show as a whole. the entire second season was useless.) I started back up at the beginning of the 4th season as a girl I was really into at the time was really into the show. I caught up and used the show as an excuse to spend time with her. My complaints remained the same and I stopped watching about halfway through the season.

I simply cannot bring myself to watch a show with boring leads and a preposterous plot. It reminds me way to much of the 6th Day, which also featured time travel (it’s so hot right now), watered down action, and a charisma challenged leading man. I want to jump into my phone booth, travel back to 2004 and make JJ Abrams do something else. (Preferably Fringe, which is right in its first season sweet spot.)

Adrian, I know that proving you wrong will not make you like Lost, but it will bring me great joy. I am currently at work on a blog that will both explain the significance of Season 2 (debunking your claim that it was “useless”), and list all of the “important” moments and events (moments that provided the viewer with information vital to the overall plot rather than the plot of a specific episode) that occurred outside of the first and last five minutes of each episode. As there are SO many of these, this blog will take me a long time to write. But it’s coming, so you better buckle up.

As for your hateful remarks regarding the cast of Lost, let me point out that the cast won the Screen Actors Guild Award for “Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series” in 2006 for the second season of the show (which you already deemed “useless”).

Also, “mildly attractive”/”mildly interesting”? I think you have set your bar a little too high.